Reactive uptake studies of NO3 and N2O5 on alkenoic acid, alkanoate, and polyalcohol substrates to probe nighttime aerosol chemistry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heterogeneous reactions between NO3 and N2O5 and diethyl sebacate (DES), glycerol, oleic acid (OA), linoleic acid (LA), and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) were studied to understand better nighttime aerosol chemistry. The reactive uptake coefficient of NO3 on the liquid alkenoic acids (OA, LA, and CLA) was found to be >0.07, which is higher than previous results for unsaturated organics, including alkenoic acids. This reaction could potentially be an important loss process of particle-phase unsaturated organic compounds in the atmosphere and in laboratory secondary organic aerosol studies. The reactive uptake coefficient of N2O5 on liquid glycerol was also found to be relatively large with a value of (3.2-8.5)x10(-4), suggesting that N2O5 heterogeneous reactions with alcohols may also be atmospherically relevant. For all measurements with OA, CLA, and DES, the reactive uptake coefficients decreased significantly upon freezing. One possible explanation is that the liquid reaction is due to both a surface reaction and a bulk reaction and that the freezing process significantly decreases the importance of any bulk reactions. NO3 reactive uptake coefficients for liquid-phase compounds decreased in magnitude in the order: alkenoic acids>DES>glycerol. This is different compared to previous gas-phase studies and the difference may be due to the large viscosity of glycerol compared to the other organic compounds studied. N2O5 reactive uptake coefficients for liquid-phase compounds decreased in magnitude in the order: glycerol>LA>DES congruent with OA congruent with CLA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".