MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P05.04. Essential Hypertension—a Cross-sectional Audit of Naturopathic Management Strategies in a Teaching Clinic

2013· article· en· W2091228525 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elaine Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Advances in Health and Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian College of Naturopathic Medicine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNaturopathyPsychological interventionAuditModalitiesPhysical therapyChiropracticAlternative medicineFamily medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Focus Area: Integrative Approaches to Care A cross-sectional audit of patient charts was conducted in the Robert Schad Naturopathic Clinic (RSNC), the largest naturopathic teaching clinic in North America, to assess the management of essential hypertension (EH) compared to recommendations made by the Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP). Objectives of this study included the assessment of adherence to 2012 CHEP guidelines, a survey of naturopathic modalities and treatments commonly used for EH in the RSNC, an analysis of efficacy of naturopathic interventions to reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), and the delivery of specific recommendations to improve EH management at the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine (CCNM) and the RSNC. Four hundred four patient charts were identified using the ICD-10 code assessment of I10 (Essential Hypertension). Two hundred eighteen files met inclusion criteria. Adherence to CHEP guidelines was measured using categories of (1) blood pressure measurements; (2) correct diagnosis/staging; (3) risk assessment, and (4) objective measures (including physical examination and laboratory investigation). Charts also were assessed for use of naturopathic interventions, for measures of SBP and DBP over time, and for laboratory markers of cardiovascular risk. Results demonstrate that common naturopathic modalities used were dietary interventions, lifestyle interventions, nutritional supplementation, and botanical medicine. Less frequently used modalities for the specific treatment of hypertension included traditional Chinese medicine, physical medicine, homeopathy, hydrotherapy, and counseling. Preliminary analysis indicates that supplementation of omega-3 fatty acids, coenzyme Q10, hibiscus, magnesium, hawthorne, and implementation of diet and exercise recommendations were most closely associated with significant reductions in SBP and DBP. Overall, audit data suggest that the RSNC clinical interns and naturopathic doctors fair well at utilizing and documenting a wide array of evidence-based naturopathic interventions with promising improvements in hypertension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.386 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Advances in Health and MedicineSame topicComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207