MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091383585 · doi:10.2741/1176

Relay and blockage of protons in water chains

2003· article· en· W2091383585 on OpenAlexafffund
Régis Pomès

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in bioscience · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicElectron Spin Resonance Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSickKids Foundation
FundersCoral Reef Conservation ProgramNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of HealthHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsProtonChemical physicsProton transportChemistryConductanceDimerRelayMoleculeMolecular dynamicsGramicidinMembraneHydrogen bondComputational chemistryPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The movement of H+ is one of the most important and ubiquitous reactions to take place in biological systems. The gramicidin A (gA) dimer, which forms a water-filled channel selective to small monovalent cations in biological membranes, is used as a model system to study the molecular determinants of biological proton transport with computer simulations. The single-file chain of water molecules, or water wire, embedded in the channel interior mediates the translocation of H+ via a hop-and-turn Grotthuss relay mechanism. Earlier work showing how the mobility of the excess proton in gA is essentially determined by the fine structure and the dynamic fluctuations (structural diffusion) of the hydrogen-bonded network is summarized. The structure and fluctuations of a methanol-containing water chain in the channel lumen suggest a molecular mechanism for the experimentally-measured attenuation of proton conductance by methanol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in bioscienceSame topicElectron Spin Resonance StudiesFrench-language works237,207