Archived polyacrylamide gels as a resource for proteome characterization by mass spectrometry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mass spectrometry was applied to identify protein spots excised from an archived two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel that had been dried and stored for eight years at room temperature. All proteins were successfully identified. Detailed characterization of protein digests by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) peptide mapping, nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry and MALDI-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry revealed no evidence of protein degradation or modifications that could hamper identification of proteins in a sequence database. The experiment with a model protein demonstrated that the pattern of tryptic peptides and the yield of individual peptides were not noticeably changed in the in-gel digest of the archived protein spot compared to the digest of the spot excised from a fresh gel. Thus, the characterization of "archived proteomes" has the potential to advance proteomic research without repeating "wet" biochemistry experiments, that had been perfected in the laboratory years ago.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it