Effects of diffusion‐controlled reactions on atom‐transfer radical polymerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A kinetic model incorporating effects of diffusion‐controlled reactions on atom‐transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) was developed. The reactions considered to be diffusion‐controlled are monomer propagation, bimolecular radical termination, chain transfer between propagating radical and catalyst, and transfer to small molecules. Model predictions indicate that a diffusion‐controlled propagation reduces the “living” behavior of the system, whereas a diffusion‐controlled termination enhances its livingness. When diffusion‐controlled transfer between chains and catalyst is considered the same in the forward and backward directions, the livingness of the system is enhanced, but if one of them is kept unchanged while the other is increased, the livingness of the system is reduced. When diffusion‐controlled termination is important, our simulations show that the overall effect of diffusion‐controlled phenomena in ATRP is to enhance the livingness of the system. Experimental data from the literature for styrene, methyl methacrylate, and methyl acrylate ATRP homopolymerizations validate the kinetic model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".