MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2091493939 · doi:10.4265/bio.19.181

Isolation and Identification of Enterobacteriaceae from Raw Horsemeat intended for Human Consumption (Basashi)

2014· article· en· W2091493939 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katsunori Furuhata, Naoto ISHIZAKI, Yutaka Sugi, Masafumi Fukuyama

Bibliographic record

VenueBiocontrol Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacter cloacaeIsolation (microbiology)EnterobacterBiologyKlebsiella pneumoniaeRaw meatMicrobiologyVeterinary medicineKlebsiellaBacteriaFood scienceEscherichia coliMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The status of Enterobacteriaceae contamination was investigated in a total of 131 samples of raw horsemeat (Basashi) intended for human consumption purchased from a general meat shop or by mail-order from October 2012 to December 2013. The bacteria were isolated from 105 of the 112 samples (93.8%). Prominent differences in the isolation rate due to the place of manufacture/sale or by the cut of the meat were not observed. Moreover, in a comparison between domestic (92.6%) and imported (100%) samples, the isolation rate was slightly higher in the imported samples. When Enterobacteriaceae isolated from raw horsemeat was identified, it was highly diverse, with 14 species identified in total. From among these species, Hafnia alvei was the most common, with 33 strains (19.8%),followed by 27 strains (16.2%) of Klebsiella pneumoniae and 26 strains (15.6%) of Enterobacter cloacae, indicating that these three species were dominant. A trend was observed, with the dominant strain differing depending on the place of manufacture/sale or the cut of the meat. H. alvei was isolated at an especially high frequency from imported samples. An investigation was carried out regarding raw horsemeat intended for human consumption from Yamanashi Prefecture and Canada, regularly purchased from one store in Kanagawa Prefecture. Enterobacteriaceae were isolated during five of nine (55.6%) trials, in which the isolated bacteria were H. alvei, K. pneumoniae, etc. Moreover, they were isolated at a very high isolation rate of seven among 10 trials for the Canadian meat, and H. alvei was the most commonly isolated bacteria. Accordingly, when an investigation was carried out regarding the differences in the strain level in the six isolates of H. alvei periodically isolated from raw horsemeat from Canada by the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern using a restriction enzyme, SfiI, there was a possibility that these were the same H-38 strain (November 2013) and H-64 strain (April 2014) as well as the same H-104 strain (July 2014) and H-131 strain (December 2014). As mentioned above, it has been demonstrated that a variety of Enterobacteriaceae were isolated from raw horsemeat (Basashi) intended for human consumption, and at a high frequency. Moreover, based on the fact that the same species or strain was chronologically isolated, the possibility of contamination by the same contamination source at different times was suggested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiocontrol Science→Same topicProbiotics and Fermented Foods→French-language works237,207→