MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091522705 · doi:10.1021/om900127u

Unsymmetrically Bridged Methyl Groups as Intermediates in the Transformation of Bridging Methylene to Bridging Acetyl Groups: Ligand Migrations and Migratory Insertions in Mixed Iridium/Ruthenium Complexes

2009· article· en· W2091522705 on OpenAlexaff
R.G. Samant, S.J. Trepanier, J.R. Wigginton, Xu Li, Matthias Bierenstiel, Robert McDonald, Michael J. Ferguson, Martín Cowie

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAgostic interactionProtonationMethyleneRutheniumIridiumTrifluoromethanesulfonateMethyl groupLigand (biochemistry)CrystallographyMigratory insertionStereochemistryDeprotonationMedicinal chemistryGroup (periodic table)CatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protonation of the methylene-bridged, tetracarbonyl species [IrRu(CO) 4 (μ-CH 2 )(dppm) 2 ][X] (X = CF 3 SO 3, BF 4 ) ( 1 ) at −90 °C yields the methyl-bridged product [IrRu(CO) 4 (μ-CH 3 )(dppm) 2 ][X] 2 (X = CF 3 SO 3, BF 4 ) ( 3 ), in which the methyl group is carbon-bound to Ir while engaged in an agostic interaction with Ru. Compound 3 is unusual in that exchange of the terminal and agostic protons of the methyl group is slow on the NMR time scale at −90 °C, allowing for the direct observation of both sets of protons and measurement of their respective C−H coupling constants at this temperature. Protonation of [IrRu(PMe 3 )(CO) 3 (μ-CH 2 )(dppm) 2 ][CF 3 SO 3 ] also yields an unsymmetrically bridged methyl complex, [IrRu(PMe 3 )(CO) 3 (μ-CH 3 )(dppm) 2 ][CF 3 SO 3 ] 2 ( 7 ), analogous to 3, and again 1 H NMR spectroscopy at temperatures below −60 °C shows separate resonances for the agostic and the terminal hydrogens of the methyl group. Both compounds display very low 1 J CH values (65 Hz ( 3 ); 72 Hz ( 7 )) for the agostic interactions, consistent with substantial weakening of the C−H bond. Warming a solution of 3 to −80 °C affords a new species, [IrRu(CH 3 )(CO) 4 (dppm) 2 ][X] 2 ( 4 ), in which the methyl group has migrated from the bridging site to a terminal position on Ir. Further warming of the triflate salt of 4 to ambient temperature results in disproportionation to give an unstable tricarbonyl, [IrRu(CH 3 )(CF 3 SO 3 )(CO) 3 (dppm) 2 ][CF 3 SO 3 ] ( 6 ), that subsequently decomposes, and the pentacarbonyl species [IrRu(CH 3 )(CO) 5 (dppm) 2 ][CF 3 SO 3 ] 2 ( 5 ). Compound 5 can be obtained as the sole product upon warming a solution of 4 under an atmosphere of CO. Stirring a solution of 5 for two days gives the migratory-insertion product, [IrRu(CO) 4 (μ-C(CH 3 )O)(dppm) 2 ][X] 2 ( 8 ), in which the acetyl group is carbon-bound to Ir and oxygen-bound to Ru. One carbonyl ligand can be removed from 8 by reflux in CH 2 Cl 2 to give [IrRu(CO) 3 (μ-C(CH 3 )O)(dppm) 2 ][BF 4 ] 2 ( 9 ), in the case of 8-BF 4, or [IrRu(CF 3 SO 3 )(CO) 3 (μ-C(CH 3 )O)(dppm) 2 ][CF 3 SO 3 ] ( 10 ), in the case of 8-CF 3 SO 3, with retention of the bridging acetyl group. Refluxing 8-CF 3 SO 3 in THF removes two carbonyl ligands to give the dicarbonyl species [IrRu(CF 3 SO 3 )(CO) 2 (μ-C(CH 3 )O)(dppm) 2 ][CF 3 SO 3 ] ( 11 ). Reaction of 9 or 10 with H 2 yields the monohydride species [IrRuH(CO) 3 (μ-C(CH 3 )O)(dppm) 2 ][X] 2 ( 12; X = BF 4, CF 3 SO 3 ) via heterolytic cleavage of dihydrogen, while reaction of 11 with H 2 at −90 °C yields the dihydrogen adduct [IrRu(H 2 )(CO) 2 (μ-C(CH 3 )O)(dppm) 2 ][CF 3 SO 3 ] ( 13 ), which upon warming above −60 °C yields the dihydride [IrRu(H) 2 (CF 3 SO 3 )(CO) 2 (μ-C(CH 3 )O)(dppm) 2 ][CF 3 SO 3 ] ( 14 ). Although compound 12 yields acetaldehyde upon reaction with CO, compound 14 gives rise to triflate ion displacement by CO, but no acetaldehyde is formed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207