MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091555533 · doi:10.1002/bit.1063

Process for degradation of nitrobenzene: Combining electron beam irradiation with biotransformation

2001· article· en· W2091555533 on OpenAlexaff
Jian‐Shen Zhao, Owen P. Ward, P. Lubicki, J.D. Cross, Peter M. Huck

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology and Bioengineering · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitrobenzeneNitrophenolChemistryDegradation (telecommunications)Aqueous solutionBiotransformationNuclear chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisEnzymeComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electron beam irradiations of aqueous solutions containing 15-30 mg/L of nitrobenzene at 60 kGy dose removed 78% of the contaminant. Three mononitrophenols were detected as by-products of electron beam treatment of nitrobenzene. A mixed culture enriched on a mixture of 2-, 3-, and 4-nitrophenol degraded both the residual nitrobenzene and the nitrophenol products. Percentage removal of nitrobenzene increased with increasing electron beam dose. This observation led to the conceptual design of a two-stage electron beam microbial process for degradation of nitrobenzene. Three groups of pure isolates were characterized from the mixed culture based on their abilities to grow on cor- responding nitrophenol substrates: Group A, 2NP(-)3NP(-)4NP(+); Group B, 2NP(+)3NP(+)4NP(-); and Group C, 2NP(-)3NP(+)4NP(-). Bacteria that grew on 3-NP transformed nitrobenzene into ammonia in the electron beam-treated nitrobenzene samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology and BioengineeringSame topicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsFrench-language works237,207