MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091608216 · doi:10.1118/1.3612044

SU-E-T-93: A CT Polymer Gel Dosimetry System for End-To-End Dosimetry

2011· article· en· W2091608216 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle Hilts, Jennifer Carrick, H Johnston, Andrew Jirasek

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImaging phantomDosimetryDosimeterRadiation treatment planningNuclear medicineQuality assuranceReproducibilityMaterials scienceDose profileRadiation therapyBiomedical engineeringMedicineRadiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To design and test an x-ray CT polymer gel dosimetry system for 3D end-to-end dosimetry of brain and head and neck radiotherapy Methods: A head and neck phantom has been designed to undergo the entire RT process from immobilization and planning CT through to treatment. The phantom houses a 1L polymer gel in one of two locations: cranial and inferiorly in the neck region allowing for quality assurance of both brain and head and neck treatment processes. The gel dosimeter measures the delivered radiation dose in 3D, and following CT read-out, provides a dose record of the entire treatment process, i.e. “end-to-end” dosimetry. Enhanced dose-sensitivity N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) based gels along with an optimized CT protocol were used to minimize uncertainty in image CT numbers (H). Tests of phantom set-up were performed to quantify image noise, uniformity and positioning reproducibility using locking bar (ideal conditions) and aquaplast mask (clinical conditions). The end-to-end dosimetry capability was tested by undertaking the full RT process (immobilization, planning CT, treatment planning, treatment set-up and delivery) and comparing delivered and planned doses for a simple “star-pattern” irradiation. Results: Removing the phantom head for gel read-out minimized noise and artifacts (63% noise reduction), produced uniform images and has minimal impact on phantom re-positioning (less than 0.5mm). Full phantom re-positioning reproducibility was also excellent: less than 0.9 mm for both locking bar and mask immobilization. Initial end-to-end dosimetry tests indicate accurate localization of treatment dose to within 1 mm. Conclusions: An x-ray CT polymer gel dosimetry system for performing 3D end-to-end dosimetry has been designed, tested and is demonstrated to provide accurate 3D localization of delivered radiation dose. Future work will assess clinical processes as undertaken by appropriate RT staff and look at other treatment sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207