MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091610817 · doi:10.2118/03-11-05

Analytical Modelling of Gas Production From Hydrates in Porous Media

2003· article· en· W2091610817 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsClathrate hydrateHydratePorous mediumCabin pressurizationPermafrostNatural gasPetroleum engineeringHeat transferPorosityEnvironmental scienceChemistryGeologyThermodynamicsMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gas hydrates are being considered as an alternative energy resource of thefuture since they exist in enormous quantities in permafrost and offshoreenvironments. However, gas production potential from hydrate reservoirs throughdifferent production schemes has not been fully investigated yet. This workintroduces a simple analytical model for simulating gas production from hydratedecomposition in porous media by a depressurization method. We consider the heat transfer to the decomposing zone, intrinsic kinetics ofhydrate decomposition, and gas-water two-phase flow as the three primarymechanisms involved in hydrate decomposition in porous media. In this study, the relative importance of these mechanisms is compared over a realistic rangeof the physical properties. It is shown that for the cases studied, the effectof two-phase flow is significantly smaller than the heat transfer and theintrinsic kinetics of hydrate decomposition. Considering the rate-controllingmechanisms, an analytical model is developed to predict the performance ofdecomposition of gas hydrates in porous media. The model is used to performsensitivity studies to investigate the feasibility of commercial gas productionfrom hydrate reservoirs. The results suggest that significant quantities of gascan be produced from gas hydrate reservoirs where the hydrate overlies the gaszone. Such reservoirs have been found in the permafrost regions of Siberia, Alaska, and Canada. Introduction The enormous natural gas reserves associated with the in situ gas hydratesin permafrost regions and offshore environments of the earth is expected to bean energy resource of the future. The gas could be produced from the hydratedissociation by depressurization, thermal stimulation, solvent injection, or acombination of these methods. The potential for gas production from hydratereservoirs through different production techniques is still uncertain and underinvestigation. One method of investigation is with the help of mathematicalmodels. For a mathematical model to be representative, it should include theimportant mechanisms. In a depressurization scheme considered in this study, three important mechanisms are involved: intrinsic decomposition of the hydratethat results in reduced temperature; heat flow towards the cooled zone thatprovides the necessary energy for further decomposition; and, flow of thedecomposed gas and water through the porous rock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it