MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091645208 · doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1129-x

The influence of bony morphology on the magnitude of the pivot shift

2010· article· en· W2091645208 on OpenAlexaff
Volker Musahl, Olufemi R. Ayeni, Musa Citak, James J. Irrgang, Andrew D. Pearle, Thomas L. Wickiewicz

Bibliographic record

VenueKnee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnterior cruciate ligamentPivot-shift testFEMORAL CONDYLEOrthopedic surgeryNuclear medicineMagnetic resonance imagingSurgeryOrthodonticsAnatomyRadiologyAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to correlate clinical pivot shift grading with femoral condyle size as measured on pre-operative magnet resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Forty-nine consecutive patients for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery were examined under anesthesia. The pivot shift was graded according to Galway et al. and MacIntosh et al. by a single observer. The grade of pivot shift, Lachman, and collateral laxity was recorded. Intraoperative findings of injury patterns to the ACL and other soft tissue structures were recorded. The anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) diameter of femoral condyles and tibial plateaus were measured on pre-operative MRI. Patients were grouped into a grade 1 pivot shift group and a grade 2 pivot shift group. ANOVA and independent t tests were used to compare bony dimensions between grade 1 and 2 pivot shifts and by sex. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Twenty-seven patients had a grade 1 pivot shift and 22 a grade 2 pivot shift. Associated pathology was present in 11/27 patients (41%) with a grade 1 pivot shift and 21/22 patients (95%) with a grade 2 pivot shift. The ML diameter of the lateral tibial plateau was significantly smaller in patients with a grade 2 pivot shift (35.5 +/- 3.7 mm) compared to patients with a grade 1 pivot shift (30.3 +/- 3.2 mm; P < 0.05). No difference was detected for any of the other measurements taken (NS). When analyzed by sex this difference existed in women (group I: 31.1 +/- 3.2, group II: 28.8 +/- 2.0; P < 0.05) but not in men (group I: 34.1 +/- 3.7, group II: 33.1 +/- 3.1; NS). All morphologic measurements were larger in men (P < 0.05). A smaller (ML) lateral tibial plateau diameter may contribute to a patient's higher-grade pivot shift. When analyzed by sex this was true for women but not for men. There are other factors contributing to the magnitude of the pivot shift, such as concomitant generalized laxity, injury to the knee joint capsule, and size/or injury of other soft tissue structures that were not analyzed in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnee Surgery Sports Traumatology ArthroscopySame topicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesFrench-language works237,207