Culture of feline corneal epithelial cells and infection with feline herpesvirus-1 as an investigative tool
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To isolate and characterize pure cultures of feline corneal epithelial cells and to assess the extent and nature of feline herpesvirus (FHV)-1 infection in these cells. SAMPLE POPULATION: Healthy eyes from 23 recently euthanatized cats. PROCEDURE: Stroma and epithelium of the rostral portion of the cornea were surgically isolated, and epithelial cells were detached from the stroma by enzymatic incubation. Epithelial cells were cultured in hormone-supplemented media. Cells were passaged, and cytokeratin expression was assessed. Cells were then infected with FHV-1, and cytopathic effects were determined. RESULTS: Cell cultures were readily established from samples obtained from each eye and could be maintained through 6 passages. Cultured cells expressed cytokeratins 3 and 12 but not other cytokeratins. Infection with FHV-1 was rapid and caused widespread cytopathic effects. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Feline corneal cells cultured in vitro during multiple passages maintain consistent morphologic characteristics and intermediate filament expression. They are susceptible to infection with FHV-1 and may provide a useful in vitro model for investigation of ocular drugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".