Structure-Function Studies of Two Novel UDP-GlcNAc C6 Dehydratases/C4 Reductases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two subfamilies of UDP-GlcNAc C6 dehydratases were recently identified. FlaA1, a short soluble protein that exhibits a typical SYK catalytic triad, characterizes one of these subfamilies, and WbpM, a large membrane protein that harbors an altered SMK triad that was not predicted to sustain activity, represents the other subfamily. This study focuses on investigating the structure and function of these C6 dehydratases and the role of the altered triad as well as additional amino acid residues involved in catalysis. The significant activity retained by the FlaA1 Y141M triad mutant and the low activity of the WbpM M438Y mutant indicated that the methionine residue was involved in catalysis. A Glu(589) residue, which is conserved only within the large homologues, was shown to be essential for activity in WbpM. Introduction of this residue in FlaA1 enhanced the activity of the corresponding V266E mutant. Hence, this glutamate residue might be responsible for the retention of catalytic efficiency in the large homologues despite alteration of their catalytic triad. Mutations of residues specific for the short homologues (Asp(70), Asp(149)-Lys(150), Cys(103)) abolished the activity of FlaA1. Among them, C103M prevented dimerization but did not significantly affect the secondary structure. The fact that we could identify subfamily-specific residues that are essential for catalysis suggested an independent evolution for each subfamily of C6 dehydratases. Finally, the loss of activity of the FlaA1 G20A mutant provided evidence that a cofactor is involved in catalysis, and kinetic study of the FlaA1 H86A mutant revealed that this conserved histidine is involved in substrate binding. None of the mutations investigated altered the substrate, product, and function specificity of these enzymes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".