MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091698467 · doi:10.1109/leos.2008.4688799

3.5 Gb/s burst-mode clock phase aligner for gigabit passive optical networks

2008· article· en· W2091698467 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Zeng, Bhavin J. Shastri, Nicholas Zicha, Michael Vander Schueren, David V. Plant

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBurst mode (computing)GigabitComputer sciencePassive optical networkOversamplingPhase (matter)Network packetMode (computer interface)Electronic engineeringPhase detectorBurst switchingPhysicsBandwidth (computing)Wavelength-division multiplexingOpticsTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringEngineeringComputer networkWavelength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fiber to the Home (FTTH) has been proven to be an efficient medium for voice, audio, and video transfer. Passive Optical Networks (PONs) are being studied as an upgradeable and low-cost solution to the problem of limited bandwidth in local access networks in the medium of FTTH. In PONs, multiple users share the fiber infrastructure in a pointto- multipoint (P2MP) network topology. The P2MP nature of networks cause the data packets from each user to undergo different amplitude, phase, and frequency variations – resulting in burst-mode traffic at the receiving end of the network. This consequently creates new challenges for the design of optical receivers. We design and experimentally demonstrate a 5 Gb/s burst-mode clock phase aligner (BM-CPA) featuring automatic phase acquisition with forward-error correction using (64, 57) Hamming codes. This BM-CPA is implemented with commercially available evaluation boards and provides instantaneous (0-bit) phase acquisition with packet loss ratio < 10^6 and bit error rate < 10^10 for any phase step (±2pi rads) between consecutive packets. Implementation of a Reed-Solomon(255, 239) code is also investigated. Our design is based on an oversampling algorithm and can be operated in two configurations: BM-CPA with a SONET CDR and BM-CPA with a local oscillator. We conclude by discussing various possible extensions to the device, based on the promising results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207