MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091745408 · doi:10.1080/0049825031000121608

Identification of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 as the major cytochrome P450 s responsible for morphine N -demethylation in human liver microsomes

2003· article· en· W2091745408 on OpenAlexaff
Denis Projean, Pierre-Emmanuel Morin, Tao Tu, Julie Ducharme

Bibliographic record

VenueXenobiotica · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersAstraZeneca
KeywordsCYP3A4MicrosomeCytochrome P450DemethylationCYP2C8ChemistryPharmacologyMorphineHydroxylationCYP2B6EnzymeBiochemistryBiologyGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. The aim was to identify the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes responsible for the N-demethylation of morphine in vitro. 2. In human liver microsomes, normorphine formation followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics with mean Km and Vmax of 12.4 +/- 2.2 mM and 1546 +/- 121 pmol min(-1) mg(-1), respectively. In microsomes from a panel of 14 human livers phenotyped for 10 CYP enzymes, morphine N-demethylation correlated with testosterone 6beta-hydroxylation (r=0.91, p<0.001) and paclitaxel 6-alpha hydroxylation (r=0.72, p<0.001), two specific markers of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8, respectively. Normorphine formation decreased when incubated in the presence of troleandomycin or quercetin (by 46 and 33-36%, respectively), which further corroborates the contribution of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8. 3. Among eight recombinant human CYP enzymes tested, CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 exhibited the highest intrinsic clearance. More than 90% of morphine N-demethylation could be accounted for via the action of both CYP3A4 and CYP2C8. 4. The in vitro findings suggest that hepatic CYP3A4, and to a lesser extent CYP2C8, play an important role in the metabolism of morphine into normorphine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations97
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueXenobioticaSame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207