MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091771334 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/33/8/313

Addendum to `On the singularity structure of the 2D Ising model susceptibility'

2000· article· en· W2091771334 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and General · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingularityAddendumSeries (stratigraphy)ScalingIsing modelMathematicsRepresentation (politics)Nonlinear systemEssential singularityMathematical physicsPure mathematicsStatistical physicsPhysicsMathematical analysisGeometryQuantum mechanicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A remarkable product formula first derived by Palmer and Tracy (1981 Adv. Appl. Math.2329) for the integrand of the two-dimensional Ising model susceptibility expansion coefficients (2n )for temperatures Tless than the critical Tcis shown to apply equally for (2n +1)for T >Tcand agrees with formulae derived by Yamada (1984 Prog. Theor. Phys.711416). This new representation simplifies the derivation of the results in the original paper of this title (1999 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.323889) to the extent that the leading series behaviour and the singularity structure can be deduced almost by inspection. The derivation of series is also simplified and I show, using extended series and knowledge of the singularity structure, that there is now unambiguous evidence for correction to scaling terms in the susceptibility beyond those inferred from a nonlinear scaling field analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it