MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091784197 · doi:10.1149/1.3314449

Measurements and Prediction of Electronic Properties of Discotic Liquid Crystalline Triphenylenes and Phthalocyanines

2010· article· en· W2091784197 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Ahmida, S. Holger Eichhorn

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriphenyleneHOMO/LUMODiscotic liquid crystalPhthalocyanineCyclic voltammetryMolecular orbitalOrganic semiconductorMaterials scienceDensity functional theoryComputational chemistryChemical physicsChemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryLiquid crystalMoleculeNanotechnologyElectrochemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective of this study is the measurement and prediction of the effect of structural changes on the electronic properties of discotic liquid crystals (DLCs), an emerging class of organic semiconductors. Relative changes in frontier orbital energies of potentially discotic triphenylene (TP) and phthalocyanine (Pc) derivatives with different substitution patterns and substituents were predicted by gas phase molecular orbital calculations at a density functional theory (DFT) level. Calculations were performed with different basis sets and obtained frontier orbital energies are compared with experimental data of TP and Pc derivatives that have been studied by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and UV-Vis spectroscopy. Particular interest was given to a possible transition from p-type to n-type properties. A LUMO energy of 4.0 eV is used as reference point because this or lower LUMO energies have been proposed to provide potentially air stable n-type organic materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryFrench-language works237,207