Laparoscopic Treatment for Pediatric Gastric Volvulus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Gastric volvulus in children may be a surgical emergency or may present more subtly. The classic symptoms of gastric volvulus include the triad of unproductive retching, epigastric distention, and the inability to pass a nasogastric tube, but these symptoms are inconsistent in children. The accepted surgical treatment for acute, subacute, or intermittent gastric volvulus is anterior gastropexy, and others have reported that this can be accomplished laparoscopically. We present further clinical experience documenting the safety and efficacy of a laparoscopic approach to gastric volvulus. Methods: This is a case series of 4 children (2 girls and 2 boys, ranging in age from 8 months to 12 years) with gastric volvulus. Two presented as emergencies, one was asymptomatic, and one presented with a feeding problem. Results: Gastric volvulus was successfully treated by laparoscopic gastropexy in all cases. Two children also had a gastrostomy tube placed for postoperative feeding. Postoperative hospital stay ranged from 3 to 12 days, the latter due to unrelated medical problems in one child. There were no direct surgical complications or noted recurrence of volvulus. All children were well at follow-up. Conclusion: Our small experience supports laparoscopic gastropexy as a safe and effective treatment for gastric volvulus in children, with no serious complications, and minimal postoperative morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".