Is Tocilizumab an Effective Option for Treatment of Refractory Uveitis Associated with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the Editor: Anti-interleukin 6 receptor (anti-IL-6R) antibodies have been effective in experimental models of autoimmune arthritis, encephalomyelitis, and also uveitis1,2. Tocilizumab (TCZ; RoActemra®, Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland), a fully humanized anti-IL-6R antibody, has been approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Efficacy has also been shown for systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)3 and vasculitis4. To date, however, no reports have appeared concerning its efficacy in JIA-associated uveitis. In about one-third of JIA patients with uveitis, eye inflammation runs a severe course and vision-threatening complications develop, and immunosuppressive treatment is required5. Because some patients do not respond properly to the widely used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors, there is a significant need … Address correspondence to Dr. A. Heiligenhaus, Department of Ophthalmology and Ophtha Lab, St. Franziskus Hospital, Hohenzollernring 74, 48145 Münster, Germany. E-mail: arnd.heiligenhaus{at}uveitis-zentrum.de
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".