Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents a case report of a 37-week gestational age (GA) female infant (CK) whose first ultrasound at 35 weeks' GA revealed polyhydramnios, fetal ascites, and a possible diaphragmatic hernia. At birth, CK had a grossly distended abdomen, prominent abdominal veins, hepatomegaly, bounding femoral pulses, and generalized edema. Initial imaging identified an absent ductus venosus, absent segment of the inferior vena cava (IVC), and prominent superior vena cava to the right atrium. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed a mass contiguous with the liver causing compression of the IVC. Biopsy confirmed infantile myofibromatosis (IM), an uncommon soft tissue neoplasm that may present at birth or in early infancy. Although rare, this neoplasm is the most common fibrous tumor of infancy. The case of CK was unusual because the solitary IM lesion was in an atypical location; a solitary lesion is not commonly found in the viscera, and solitary lesions are predominant in males. Although lesions are often benign, visceral involvement is associated with high mortality. The cause is unknown, although familial cases have been reported. This article describes the key features of IM, possible treatment options, nursing care, and prognosis for infants with the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".