Preliminary crystallographic study of two cuticle-degrading proteases from the nematophagous fungi<i>Lecanicillium psalliotae</i>and<i>Paecilomyces lilacinus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cuticle-degrading proteases are extracellular subtilisin-like serine proteases that are secreted by entomopathogenic and nematophagous fungi. These proteases can digest the host cuticle during invasion of an insect or nematode and serve as a group of important virulence factors during the infection of nematodes by nematophagous fungi. To elucidate the mechanism of interaction between the proteases and the nematode cuticle, two cuticle-degrading proteases, Ver112 from Lecanicillium psalliotae (syn. Verticillium psalliotae) and PL646 from Paecilomyces lilacinus, were studied. The Ver112 protein and the complex between PL646 and the substrate-like tetrapeptide inhibitor methoxysuccinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-chloromethyl ketone (MSU-AAPV) were crystallized using the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method at 289 K. The crystals were analyzed by X-ray diffraction to resolutions of 1.65 and 2.2 A, respectively. These analyses identified that crystals of Ver112 belonged to space group P2(1)2(1)2(1), with unit-cell parameters a = 43.7, b = 67.8, c = 76.3 A, alpha = beta = gamma = 90 degrees . In contrast, crystals of the PL646-MSU-AAPV complex belonged to space group P2(1), with unit-cell parameters a = 65.1, b = 62.5, c = 67.6 A, beta = 92.8 degrees .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".