Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intestinal protozoa have gained importance to physicians practicing medicine in the United States, Canada, and Europe during recent years as a result of increasing world travel, the globalization of the world's economy, and the growing number of chronically immunosuppressed people. During the spring of 1996, Cyclospora cayetanensis caused diarrhea in approximately 1500 people exposed to Guatemalan raspberries. This epidemic recurred in 1997, emphasizing the risks of the global economy and food supply on which we depend. In addition to importation of intestinal protozoa from the tropics, AIDS and the increasing use of organ transplants have created a new population of people at risk for chronic infection by ubiquitous protozoa previously not known to cause serious human disease. These infections include cryptosporidiosis, isosporiasis, and microsporidiosis. Finally, Entamoeba histolytica, the etiologic agent of invasive amebiasis, has only recently been recognized to be a distinct species from a nonpathogenic but indistinguishable (by light microscopy) intestinal commensal, Entamoeba dispar. The rapidly changing epidemiology of these intestinal protozoa, as well as new approaches to diagnosis and treatment of these protozoa, are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".