MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091922700 · doi:10.1080/14681366.2012.759135

<i>The Simpsons</i> as a satirical portrayal of neoliberal influence on public education

2013· article· en· W2091922700 on OpenAlex
Jonas Kiedrowski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePedagogy Culture and Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHumor Studies and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeoliberalism (international relations)ScholarshipCynicismIdeologySociologyPerformativityPolitical economyPoliticsPolitical scienceSocial scienceGender studiesLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rooted in the scholarship of Michael W. Apple, this study examined how The Simpsons portrayed neoliberalism’s influence on public education prior to the introduction of ‘No Child Left Behind’. A framework of neoliberalism as it relates to public education was built using four specific categories put forth by Apple: privatisation, marketisation, performativity, and the enterprising individual. These categories formed the basis of a conceptual content analysis that sampled the first 12 seasons of The Simpsons. What was found was that while The Simpsons tended to critique education in a manner similar to what neoliberal ideology contends, when the programme’s schooling enveloped neoliberal values and reforms believed to be a ‘fix’ for education, schooling was not improved but rather further damaged. This cynicism towards neoliberal reforms suggested that The Simpsons provides wider opportunity to expose and discuss the folly of neoliberalism’s influence on public education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it