Predicting Retention Time Shifts Associated with Variation of the Gradient Slope in Peptide RP-HPLC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have developed a sequence-specific model for predicting slopes (S) in the fundamental equation of linear solvent strength theory for the reversed-phase HPLC separation of tryptic peptides detected in a typical bottom-up-proteomics experiment. These slopes control the variation in the separation selectivity observed when the physical parameters of chromatographic separation, such as gradient slope, flow rate, and column size are altered. For example, with the use of an arbitrarily chosen set of tryptic peptides with a 4-times difference in the gradient slope between two experiments, the R(2)-value of correlation between the observed retention times of identical species decreases to ~0.993-0.996 (compared to a theoretical value of ~1.00). The observed retention time shifts associated with variations of the gradient slope can be predicted a priori using the approach described here. The proposed model is based on our findings for a set of synthetic species (Vu, H.; Spicer, V.; Gotfrid, A.; Krokhin, O. V. J. Chromatogr., A, 2010, 1217, 489-497), which postulate that slopes S can be predicted taking into account simultaneously peptide length, charge, and hydrophobicity. Here we extend this approach using an extensive set of real tryptic peptides. We developed the procedure to accurately measure S-values in nano-RP HPLC MS experiments and introduced sequence-specific corrections for a more accurate prediction of the slopes S. A correlation of ~0.95 R(2)-value between the predicted and experimental S-values was demonstrated. Predicting S-values and calculating the expected retention time shifts when the physical parameters of separation like gradient slope are altered will facilitate a more accurate application of peptide retention prediction protocols, aid in the transfer of scheduled MRM (SRM) procedures between LC systems, and increase the efficiency of interlaboratory data collection and comparison.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".