High resolution imaging of changes in the structure and spatial organization of chromatin, γ-H2A.X and the MRN complex within etoposide-induced DNA repair foci
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The focal accumulation of DNA repair factors, including the MRE11/Rad50/NBS1 (MRN) complex and the phosphohistone variant gamma-H2A.X, is a key cytological feature of the DNA damage response (DDR). Although these foci have been extensively studied by light microscopy, there is comparatively little known regarding their ultrastructure. Using correlative light microscopy and electron spectroscopic imaging (LM/ESI) we have characterised the ultrastructure of chromatin and DNA repair foci within the nuclei of normal human fibroblasts in response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The induction of DNA DSBs by etoposide leads to a global decrease in chromatin density, which is accompanied by the formation of invaginations of the nuclear envelope as revealed by live-cell microscopy. Using LM/ESI and the immunogold localisation of gamma-H2A.X and MRE11 within repair foci, we also observed decondensed 10 nm chromatin fibres within repair foci and the accumulation of large non-chromosomal protein complexes over three hours recovery from etoposide. At 18 h after etoposide treatment, we observed a close juxtapositioning of PML nuclear bodies and late repair foci of gamma-H2A.X, which exhibited a highly organised chromatin arrangement distinct from earlier repair foci. Finally, the dual immunogold labelling of MRE11 with either gamma-H2A.X or NBS1 revealed that gamma-H2A.X and the MRN complex are sub-compartmentalised within repair foci at the sub-micron scale. Together these data provide the first ultrastructural comparison of gamma-H2A.X and MRN DNA repair foci, which are structurally dynamic over time and strikingly similar in organisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".