MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092001105 · doi:10.1139/o01-151

In vivo DNA-protein interactions at hypersensitive site 3.5 of the human β-globin locus control region

2001· article· en· W2092001105 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dong-dong Xu, De‐Pei Liu, Xinjun Ji, Xiang Lv, Chih‐Chuan Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypersensitive siteLocus control regionBiologyGlobinMolecular biologyFootprintingGeneDeoxyribonuclease IGene expressionCell biologyGeneticsPromoterTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction and in vivo footprinting methods to study the status of DNA-protein interactions at hypersensitive site 3.5 (HS3.5) of the locus control region in K562 and HEL cells, we found that there was protein occupancy in vivo at HS3.5 in both cell lines and the status of DNA-protein interaction was different between K562 and HEL. These data provide direct evidence that specific nuclear factor-DNA complexes form in vivo at functionally important sequence motifs of the HS3.5 in erythroid cells. This indicates that HS3.5 may play an important role in the regulation of the beta-globin gene cluster. K562 is a human erythroleukemia cell line in which the embryonic epsilon-globin gene is predominantly expressed, while the HEL cell line expresses predominantly the fetal beta-globin genes. Thus, HS3.5 might also be involved in the regulation of developmental stage-specific expression of beta-globin genes. Our results are also consistent with the model that each hypersensitive site acts as a functional unit and HS3.5 may facilitate the formation of the HS3 functional unit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207