MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092033212 · doi:10.1051/ao4elt/201004002

ELP-OA: status report of the setup of the demonstrator of the Polychromatic Laser Guide Star at Observatoire de Haute-Provence

2010· preprint· en· W2092033212 on OpenAlexaff
R. Foy, N. Meilard, Michel Tallon, Éric Thiébaut, Pierre-Éric Blanc, Maarten P. Boer, J. Chombart, A. Laloge, A. Le Van Suu, S. Perruchot, Xavier Régal, J. H. M. M. Schmitt, Thierry Fusco

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStar (game theory)LaserComputer sciencePhysicsOpticsRemote sensingGeographyAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the status of ELP-OA (Etoile Laser polychromatique pour l’Optique Adaptative), the full demonstrator which we are building at OHP 1.52m telescope. The goal is to open adaptive optics to the domain of visible wavelengths at large telescopes, which is almost not feasible today because of the tiny isoplanatic patch. ELP-OA relies on the 2-photon excitation of sodium in the mesosphere, through 589 and 569 nm transitions. We use 2 pulsed dye lasers (on loan from CEA) pumped with NdYAGs. The average power at the mesosphere will be 2 × 22W. The twin laser beams are projected to the mesosphere by a 3-aperture interferometer. The backscattered ´ spots in NaI lines at 330, 569 and 589nm are oberved through an adaptive optics at the telescope coude focus, derived from the ONERA’s BOA device. The differential tilt measurement channel is equipped with an EMCCD. We use a correlation algorithm to extract it. From our end to end model we expect tilt Strehl ratios of 35% at 550nm (see Meilard et al in this conference). First lasers launches are planned early 2010, with the full experiment running 2011.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstronomical Observations and InstrumentationFrench-language works237,207