Reduced parasite infestation in urban Eurasian blackbirds (Turdus merula): a factor favoring urbanization?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Humans nowadays dramatically alter environmental and ecological conditions worldwide. One of the most extreme forms of anthropogenic land-use alteration is urbanization. Animals thriving in urban areas are not only exposed to different environmental conditions compared with their nonurban conspecifics, but prevalence and impacts of wildlife diseases on urban populations may also be affected. In the present study, we tested whether blood-parasite prevalence differs between urban and forest habitats by comparing haematozoan infections of urban and forest-living Eurasian blackbirds ( Turdus merula L., 1758). In total, 76% of Eurasian blackbirds were infected with haematozoa and we detected five different blood parasite genera in both habitats. Blood-parasite prevalence varied both between years and between spring and summer in both urban and forest populations. Forest blackbirds had more parasite genera per individual than urban blackbirds, and in summer, forest blackbirds had higher blood-parasite prevalence than their urban conspecifics. These differences in blood-parasite prevalence between urban and forest blackbirds suggest a lower risk of haematozoan infections in urban than in forest habitats. The lower parasite prevalence could be one of the factors favoring the invasion of urban ecosystems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it