BILINGUAL MEN BUT NOT WOMEN DISPLAY LESS LEFT EAR BUT NOT RIGHT EAR ACCURACY DURING DICHOTIC LISTENING COMPARED TO MONOLINGUALS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kimura Recurring Figures were presented after the priming trial to the upper or lower, left or right, tachistoscopic fields while monopolar electroencephalographic activity was measured over the left and right parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes for 9 men and 9 women. The relative proportions of alpha rhythms during the 2 sec after each of 64 presentations were employed as the primary measure. The powerful asymmetry in electroencephalographic activity, manifested as a paucity of alpha activity over the right temporal lobe compared to the left temporal lobe, was not observed for the parietal or occipital regions. There was conspicuously more relative activity over the parietal and occipital lobes, but not over the temporal lobes, during presentations of the familiar figures compared to the unfamiliar figures. Several interactions--explaining more than 25% of the variance--between gender, left and right hemispheric EEG activity, and visual quadrants were consistent with lateralization of function and gender differences in functional brain organization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".