Negotiating hybridity: transnational reconstruction of migrant subjectivity in Koreatown, Los Angeles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Transnationalism has emerged as a key factor in altering immigrant ethnic enclaves by networking them with global flows of capital and labor. A quintessential example is Koreatown in Los Angeles, often portrayed as the 'overseas Korean capital.' The area has experienced rapid transition since the mid-1990s that is related to a huge influx of South Korean transnational investment and, concomitantly, migrants of various backgrounds. This study investigates the resulting transformation of the built environment, residential composition, and social relations in Koreatown. Of particular interest are the ways in which Korean and other transnational migrants flexibly alter their identities in terms of the situations in which they exist. Semi-structured and informal interviews with key informants were conducted, focusing on autobiographic narrations related to the discursive structure of their identities. Information from mainstream and Korean-American newspapers and previous academic work also are central to interpreting the qualitative data. We argue that, in contrast to the common view, Los Angeles's Koreatown is a highly multicultural, heterogeneous space. Therefore, it is suggested that this area should be reconsidered as a hybrid, rather than homogeneous, space where intra- and interethnic identities are flexibly reproduced, contested, and combined in the course of localized global interactions. Keywords: Los Angeles Koreatowntransnationalismmulticulturalismundocumented workersflexible identitieshybrid space Acknowledgements This paper was written while Youngmin Lee was a visiting scholar at the Ohio State University Department of Geography, which welcomed him into its excellent professional environment. He is particularly indebted to Larry Brown for his valuable comments and suggestions in writing this paper and to Morton O'Kelly who, as Department Chair, provided essential infrastructure and support for a successful 2006–07 academic year. Editing was carried out by Susan Mantey Vaughn, and her work is much appreciated. Both authors express deep appreciation to the interviewees who gave them valuable time and constitute an integral element of this paper. Notes 1. In more detail, the sample included 12 documented Koreans (10 male, 2 female); 8 undocumented Koreans (4 male, 4 female); and 1 non-Korean, a documented male Bangladeshi. Among the documented Koreans, 4 were NGO employees, 2 professionals, 2 small business owners, 1 realtor, 1 large business owner, 1 student, and 1 housewife. 2. Affluent Koreans also carry the Kirerki practice to other English-speaking countries such as Canada, Australia, or South Africa. 3. Most Chosun-jok are Koreans from Manchuria, the Northeastern portion of China that borders North Korea, where Yenbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture is located. They migrated there to escape from the Japanese violent colonial rule in Korea in the early twentieth century. Although most of their descendents have maintained the Korean language and culture in China, they are customarily called 'Cho-sun-jok' both by themselves and by Koreans (Cho-sun is the name of the last Dynasty of Korea that perished in 1910). 4. They refer to Chinese and their descendents having lived in Korea, who had emigrated from either pre-communized mainland China or Taiwan in the early and mid-twentieth century
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it