MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092134322 · doi:10.2134/agronj2012.0500

Soil Phosphorus Effects on Forage Harvested and Nitrogen Fixation on Canadian Organic Dairy Farms

2013· article· en· W2092134322 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Michael Main, Derek H. Lynch, R. P. Voroney, Shelly Juurlink

Bibliographic record

VenueAgronomy Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsForageAgronomyLegumePhosphorusBiologyNitrogen fixationAnimal scienceNitrogenChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Declining soil‐test phosphorus (STP) levels on eastern Canadian organic dairy farms is a concern because of potential negative impacts on forage growth and biological nitrogen fixation (BNF). This study examined the relationship between STP, forage productivity, and BNF on organic or transitional‐organic dairy farms in Ontario (ON) and Nova Scotia (NS). More than two‐thirds of 28 legume–grass mixed forage fields in the study were low in available P by provincial soil‐test guidelines. Averaged across all fields over 2 yr, forage legume proportion was 46%, forage harvested 5.9 Mg ha –1 , BNF 64 kg ha –1 , and N harvested 153 kg N ha –1 . Forage tissue P concentrations were clearly correlated with STP in the low soil‐test categories (<10 mg Olsen P kg –1 of soil in ON; <30 mg Mehlich‐3 P kg –1 of soil in NS), above which there was little response. Inclusion of soil total P or organic P did not improve the fit of regressions. However, STP explained a very small fraction of variation in forage harvested and BNF. Ninety percent of tissue P concentrations were above 2 g P kg –1 of tissue, a frequently cited critical minimum, and the only apparently P deficient forage crops were on fields that received no manures or fertilizers for more than 5 yr. In the term of this study, low STP was apparently not having a significant impact on forage harvested or BNF on the majority of eastern Canadian organic dairy farms. This result may not apply to seedling‐year forages or other crops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgronomy JournalSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207