MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092209874 · doi:10.1136/jmg.40.6.418

A new genetic locus for X linked progressive cone-rod dystrophy

2003· article· en· W2092209874 on OpenAlexaff
Reetta Jalkanen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Genetics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Eye InstituteNational Institutes of HealthResearch to Prevent Blindness
KeywordsLocus (genetics)GeneticsBiologyGenetic linkageRetinitis pigmentosaGenetic heterogeneityExonGene mappingGenetic markerGenePhenotypeChromosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

X linked progressive cone-rod dystrophy (COD) is a retinal disease primarily affecting the cone photoreceptors. The disease is genetically heterogeneous and two loci, COD1 (Xp21.1-11.4) and COD2 (Xq27.2-28), have been previously identified. COD1 was recently shown to be caused by mutations in RPGR exon ORF15 (Xp21.1), the gene that is also responsible for RP3 type retinitis pigmentosa. In this study, we performed a linkage study to map the disease gene in a large Finnish family with X linked cone-rod dystrophy, using a panel of 39 X chromosomal markers. Several recombinations between the disease gene and markers in the Xp21.1-p11.4 region have excluded COD1 as a candidate locus in this family. Consistent with the linkage results, no mutation was detected by direct PCR sequencing of the coding region of RPGR, including exon ORF15. The COD2 locus has been also excluded as the site of the gene on the basis of negative lod score values obtained for COD2 linked markers. The disease causing gene of the studied COD family has been localised between the markers DXS10042 and DXS8060 on Xp11.4-q13.1. Positive pairwise lod scores >3 were obtained for markers DXS993, MAOB, DXS1055, and DXS1194. Since this locus is distinct from the previously identified two loci, COD1 and COD2, our results establish a new third genetic locus for X linked progressive cone-rod dystrophy and further expands our knowledge about the genetic heterogeneity underlying this disease entity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical GeneticsSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207