MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092244890 · doi:10.1021/es034702a

Effect of Dissolved Organic Carbon on the Photoproduction of Dissolved Gaseous Mercury in Lakes:  Potential Impacts of Forestry

2004· article· en· W2092244890 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nelson J. O’Driscoll, D. R. S. Lean, Lisa L. Loseto, Richard Carignan, Steven D. Siciliano

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissolved organic carbonMercury (programming language)Environmental chemistryPhotosynthetically active radiationSurface waterHydrology (agriculture)ChemistryEnvironmental scienceTotal organic carbonEnvironmental engineeringGeologyPhotosynthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The production of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM) in freshwater lakes is induced by solar radiation and is also thought to be linked to processes mediated by dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Studies investigating these processes using comparisons between lakes are often confounded by differences in DOC content and structure. In this study, we investigated the link between DOC concentrations and DGM production by using tangential ultrafiltration to manipulate DOC concentrations in water samples taken from a given lake. In this way, a range of samples with different DOC concentrations was produced without substantial changes to DOC structure or dissolved ions. This was repeated for four lakes in central Quebec: two with highly logged drainage basins and two with minimally logged drainage basins. On two separate days for each lake, water samples (filtered to remove >99% of microorganisms) with varying DOC concentrations were incubated in clear and dark Teflon bottles on the lake surface. DGM concentrations were measured at 3.5-h intervals over the course of 10.5 h. Levels of DGM concentrations increased with increasing cumulative irradiation for all lakes until approximately 4000 kJ m(-2) (400-750 nm, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR)), when DGM concentrations reached a plateau (between 20 and 200 pg L(-1)). When we assumed that DGM production was limited by the amount of photoreducible mercury, reversible first-order reaction kinetics fitted the observed data well (r2 ranging between 0.59 and 0.98, p < 0.05 with the exception of N70 100% DOC, 0% DOC, and K2 0% DOC with p = 0.06, 0.10, and 0.11, respectively). The DGM plateaus were independent of DOC concentrations but differed between lakes. In contrast, photoproduction efficiency (DGMprod) (i.e., the amount of DGM produced per unit radiation (fg L(-1) (kJ/m2)(-1)) below 4000 kJ m(-2) PAR) was linearly proportional to DOC concentration for both logged lakes (r2 = 0.97, p < 0.01) and nonlogged lakes (r2 = 0.52, p = 0.018) studied. Furthermore, logged lakes had a lower DGMprod per unit DOC (p < 0.01) than the nonlogged lakes. In these four lakes, the rate of DGM production per unit PAR was dependent on the concentration of DOC. The DGM plateau was independent of DOC concentration; however, there was a significant difference in DGM plateaus between lakes presumably due to different DOC structures and dissolved ions. This research demonstrates an important mechanism by which logging may exacerbate mercury levels in biota.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations106
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207