Pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in cats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of lamivudine (3TC) in cats. ANIMALS: 6 sexually intact 9-month-old barrier-reared domestic shorthair cats. PROCEDURE: Cats were randomly alloted into 3 groups, and lamivudine (25 mg/kg) was administered i.v., intragastrically (i.g.), and p.o. in a 3-way crossover study design with 2-week washout periods between experiments. Plasma samples were collected for 12 hours after drug administration, and lamivudine concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax), and bioavailability were compared between i.g. and p.o. routes. Area under the curve (AUC) and terminal phase half-life (t(1/2)) among the 3 administration routes were also compared. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of lamivudine declined rapidly with a t(1/2) of 1.9 +/- 0.21 hours, 2.6 +/- 0.66 hours, and 2.7 +/- 1.50 hours after i.v., i.g., and p.o. administration, respectively. Total body clearance and steady-state volume of distribution were 0.22 +/- 0.09 L/h/kg and 0.60 +/- 0.22 L/kg, respectively. Mean Tmax for i.g. administration (0.5 hours) was significantly shorter than Tmax for p.o. administration (1.1 hours). The AUC after i.v., i.g., and p.o. administration was 130 +/- 55.2 mg x h/L, 115 +/- 97.5 mg x h/L, and 106 +/- 94.9 mg x h/L, respectively. Lamivudine was well absorbed after i.g. and p.o. administration with bioavailability values of 88 +/- 45% and 80 +/- 52%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cats had a shorter t(1/2) but slower total clearance of lamivudine, compared with humans. Plasma concentrations of lamivudine were maintained above the minimum effective concentration for inhibiting FIV replication by 50% (0.14 microM [0.032 microg/mL] for wild-type FIV clinical isolate) for at least 12 hours after i.v., i.g., or p.o. administration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".