MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092382554 · doi:10.1021/bi0118052

Role of the N-Terminal Helix I for Dimerization and Stability of the Calcium-Binding Protein S100B

2002· article· en· W2092382554 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Ferguson, Gary S. Shaw

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCooperativityGuanidineDenaturation (fissile materials)MutantCalciumCrystallographyHelix bundleDimerHelix (gastropod)Calcium-binding proteinBiophysicsProtein structureBiochemistryBiologyNuclear chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human S100B(beta beta) is a small intracellular EF-hand calcium-binding protein that consists of two noncovalently associated 91-residue beta monomers. The three-dimensional structures of S100B reveal the dimer interface consists of four alpha-helices (I, I' and IV, IV') packed in an X-type bundle. In this study, guanidine hydrochloride denaturation and dynamic light scattering were used to assess the impact of single (L3A, L3S, M7A, I11A, F14A) and double (L3A/I11A and L3A/F14A) substitution mutations in helix I on the stability and dimerization propensity of S100B. The free energy of unfolding (Delta G(u)) of wild-type apo-S100B was determined to be 72.4 +/- 4.0 kJ mol(-1), consistent with it being the most stable calcium-binding protein to date. The order of stability of the mutants in their apo form is S100B > L3A > L3S > I11A > M7A approximately L3A/I11A > F14A > L3A/F14A. Further, there is a strong correlation between the stability and the cooperativity of unfolding. Each mutation proved to be more stable in its calcium form compared to its apo form. The calcium-bound L3S substitution proved to be significantly more stable than calcium-saturated S100B, whereas the L3A, I11A, and L3A/I11A mutants are only slightly more stable than the wild-type protein. The F14A and L3A/F14A mutants are significantly reduced in stability, even in the presence of calcium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207