MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Endothelin-A-Receptor Antagonist PD180988 (CI-1034) Selectively Reverses the Pulmonary Vasoconstrictor Response to Hypoxia in the Lamb

2000· article· en· W2092392561 on OpenAlexaff
Yashu Coe, Stephen J. Haleen, Kathleen M. Welch, Flavio Coceani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoxic pulmonary vasoconstrictionHypoxia (environmental)Pulmonary hypertensionVasoconstrictionMedicineEndothelin receptorEndothelin receptor antagonistAntagonistContractilityEndothelin 1Internal medicineBolus (digestion)Vasoconstrictor AgentsCardiologyAnesthesiaReceptorChemistryOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is assigned a mediator role in the constrictor response of the pulmonary vasculature to hypoxia. Accordingly, a recently developed endothelin-A (ETA) antagonist, PD180988, was tested in the chronically instrumented newborn lamb to verify this possibility and, at the same time, to study a potential new treatment for pulmonary hypertension (PH). PD180988, given by infusion after a priming bolus, had an insignificant effect on the pulmonary circulation under normoxia, while it reversed the sustained pulmonary constriction caused by hypoxia. No appreciable change was noted under either experimental condition in the systemic circulation and cardiac contractility. We conclude that PD180988 is a selective inhibitor of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and lends itself to therapeutic use in infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular PharmacologySame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207