Phenotypic Activation to Discover Biological Pathways and Kinase Substrates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Observing the effects of gene perturbation on cells or organisms has long been a standard strategy in biological research. We developed a genome-wide gene overexpression library as a new tool for large-scale functional analysis in budding yeast. Previous large-scale genetic studies have focused on applications of the deletion mutant collection, which has arguably revolutionized the functional characterization of yeast genes. While extremely powerful, deletion mutant experiments are generally limited to the characterization of loss-of-function phenotypes. We have explored the potential for using the Synthetic Genetic Array (SGA) method, a platform for high-throughput genetic analysis, with a genome-wide "overexpression array", in which each strain on the array overexpresses a unique yeast gene. The overexpression array enables gain-of-function phenotypes to be examined on a large scale, providing a unique insight into gene function and a novel source of reagents for the global mapping of genetic networks and functional relationships amongst genes and pathways. Understanding the molecular bases of overexpression phenotypes should also shed new light on the nature of genetic dominance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".