Architectural and genotypic variation in the clonal shrub <i>Taxus canadensis</i> as determined from random amplified polymorphic DNA and amplified fragment length polymorphism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada yew (Taxus canadensis Marsh.) is a clonal species with two types of ramets. The most common type has bilateral symmetry and alternate branching. The radial symmetry and opposite branching of the rarer type are similar to the architecture expressed in a young plant grown from seed. Architectural analysis was conducted on four colonies of increasing age and size. A genetic analysis using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) was conducted on 122 ramets, 93 sampled from nine colonies from a single population, 24 from eight other populations, and five from other Taxus species. Analysis of the architectural development sequence shows that yew follows the same architectural model as, for example, species of Abies or Picea. This model constitutes a level of organization intermediate between that of the ramet and of the genet. The molecular analyses confirm the greater variability of AFLPs over RAPDs and indicate that architecture is not directly related to genotypic variation. Ramets with radial symmetry have slightly higher genetic variation, on average, than ramets with bilateral symmetry with 95% degree of confidence. The molecular analyses show that the level of resolution of the AFLPs is adequate to characterize 98% of the ramets of a colony. Between pairs of physically connected ramets, some random genotypic differences are observed, supporting the hypothesis of genetic mosaicism in plants, due to somaclonal variations.Key words: architecture, clonal plant, intraclonal variation, molecular markers, somaclonal mutations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".