Electrochemistry of InSb as a Li Insertion Host: Problems and Prospects
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ballmilling of In and Sb has been used to produce InSb for use in electrochemical and in situ X-ray diffraction studies (XRD) of ethylene carbonate:diethyl carbonate/InSb cells. The cell capacity decays rapidly when cycled between 0 and 1.3 V, while the capacity reduction is less pronounced when cycling is restricted to the 0.65-1.4 V range. In situ XRD studies reveal that and In are formed during the first plateau (above 0.65 V), according to the reaction The indium product subsequently reacts with Li forming the phases InLi and in sequence. When cells are cycled above 0.6 V (i.e., in the absence of formation) capacity retention improves significantly, remaining relatively constant near 250 mAh/g. Detailed in situ XRD studies of these cells suggest that 0.27 Li atoms per InSb may be intercalated during a sharp drop in the cell potential, according to the reaction This intercalation accounts for only a small (about 30 mAh/g) fraction of the overall capacity of 680 mAh/g. Consequently, it appears that the reactivity of In and Sb with Li, not the structure type, determines the reaction path. Therefore, InSb is not an attractive intercalation host for Li, in contrast to the claims made in the literature. © 2001 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it