MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092525385 · doi:10.1353/ecf.2004.0052

Patterns of Marginality in French Prose Fiction, 1701-1800

2004· article· en· W2092525385 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Richard L. Frautschi, Angus Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiteratureNarrativeHistoryArtSubject (documents)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patterns of Marginality in French Prose Fiction, 1701-1800 Richard L. Frautschi and Angus Martín Widi an assessment ofover 1 1,000 first editions and dieir reissues for die fordicoming Bibliographie du genre romanesquefrançais, 1 700-1800 (MMF2) , we have confirmed die coming ofage ofa once ill-considered prose form.1 During a search for works of narrative fiction in French and an elaboration of content summaries, we have encountered a modest number ofitems diat defy rejection, yetwhich we hesitate to present as mainstream prose fiction. In 1977, with die publication of our French prose fiction bibliography for the second halfofdie century (MMFl), the problem ofsuch indeterminate works had already arisen, and we identified as "marginal" certain tides containing para-fictive, if not non-fictive, components.2 This article presents areviewofdiree prevalent categories ofsuch hybrids, situated in the generic borderlands offullyfledged or "standard" prose fiction. As in Maurice Lever's listing ofseventeendi-century French fiction, MMF2 will include a list ofworks widi titles diat suggest prose fiction, while dieir actual non-fictive subject matterjustifies rejection.3 Genre markers in titles, it should be noted, are far from reliable in deciding what is prose fiction and what is not. Poèmes can be in prose and 1 See Frautschi and Martin, "French Prose Fiction Published between 1700 and 1751: ANew Profile ofProduction," Eighteenth-Century Fiction 14:3-4 (2002), 735-56. 2 Angus Martin, Vivienne G. Mylne, and Richard Frautschi, Bibliographie du genre romanesque français, 1751-1800 (London: Mansell; Paris: France-Expansion, 1977). 3 La Fiction narrative au XVIIe siècle: répertoire bibliographique du genre romanesque ¡600-1 700 (Paris: CNRS, 1976). EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION, Volume 16, Number 4,JuIy 2004 544 EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION narrative in form and contes and nouvelles can be in verse. The terms histoires and mémoires have long been appropriated by novelists, historians, and biographers. The use of die term roman in a tide can refer to a play, as in Melfort's Les Amazones révoltées, roman moderne (1738), or to a dissertation, as in die anonymous Leroman cabalistique (1750). Lesprincipales aventures de l'admirabledon (Quichotte (1746) turns out to be a collection ofengravings, and de Groot's Les agréments de la campagne (1750) describes die construction ofcountry houses. Not all such tides can, however, be so easily rejected. In MMFl and again in MMF2, we have included, but classified widi die marker "m" (for "marginal"), avariety oftypes ofwork diat combine characteristics offictive prose narrative widi atypical or non-fictive components. Some ofthese are whatmaybe termed generic crossovers: for example, prose translations from verse originals, be diey epic poems, narrative ballads, or pastoral idylls. Aldiough theatrical forms are regularly excluded from our listings, exceptional cases do exist, such as Bret's Essai decontes morauxetdramatiques (1765), where die authorexplicidypresents stories as reading matter radier dian for stage production. As well as diese atypical forms of prose narrative, die fictional/factual status of die contents is unclear in odier forms. Hesitations about die classification ofsome narrations either as history or as fiction can frequently occur in works purporting to be memoirs, biographies, travel narratives, descriptions of social life in spa towns, faits divers, scandals, wordiy deeds, legal cases, or hagiography. For example, Bret's Mémoires surla vie de mademoiselle de L'Enclos is usually considered to be history, but Damour's Lettres deNinon deLéñelos au marquis de Sévignéis accepted as fiction. The appurtenances of historical writing, such as dates, notes, eyewitness reports, and odier marginalia, are at times used for fictive verisimilitude and also forsatirical orburlesque effect: for example, the anonymous Histoire des rats (1737). In our bibliography, we do not include stories published in periodicals, unless later republished in book form: for example, Lettres d'un sauvage dépaysé (1738).4 However, some of die marginal formulae discussed in this article are close to methods of the journalistic periodical, be diey miscellanies widi occasional stories or essays where a "spectator" observes social behaviour and illustrates it with embedded portraits and vignettes. Such minimal fictive 4 That is, if die titles appear in Dictionnaire desjournaux, 1600-1 789, 2 vols., ed.Jean Sgard (Paris: Universitas; Oxford...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century FictionSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207