Engineering Soluble Monomeric Streptavidin with Reversible Biotin Binding Capability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monomeric streptavidin with reversible biotin binding capability has many potential applications. Because a complete biotin binding site in each streptavidin subunit requires the contribution of tryptophan 120 from a neighboring subunit, monomerization of the natural tetrameric streptavidin can generate streptavidin with reduced biotin binding affinity. Three residues, valine 55, threonine 76, and valine 125, were changed to either arginine or threonine to create electrostatic repulsion and steric hindrance at the interfaces. The double mutation (T76R,V125R) was highly effective to monomerize streptavidin. Because interfacial hydrophobic residues are exposed to solvent once tetrameric streptavidin is converted to the monomeric state, a quadruple mutein (T76R,V125R,V55T,L109T) was developed. The first two mutations are for monomerization, whereas the last two mutations aim to improve hydrophilicity at the interface to minimize aggregation. Monomerization was confirmed by four different approaches including gel filtration, dynamic light scattering, sensitivity to proteinase K, and chemical cross-linking. The quadruple mutein remained in the monomeric state at a concentration greater than 2 mg/ml. Its kinetic parameters for interaction with biotin suggest excellent reversible biotin binding capability, which enables the mutein to be easily purified on the biotin-agarose matrix. Another mutein (D61A,W120K) was developed based on two mutations that have been shown to be effective in monomerizing avidin. This streptavidin mutein was oligomeric in nature. This illustrates the importance in selecting the appropriate residues and approaches for effective monomerization of streptavidin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".