MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Occurrence of Dynamic Alpha-Phase Nucleation in Ti-5553 during Hot Deformation

2014· article· en· W2092571140 on OpenAlexaff
Ameth Fall, David Piot, F. Montheillet, Sandra Andrieu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTitanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceNucleationIsothermal processMicrostructureStrain rateFlow stressAusteniteSofteningMetallurgyDeformation (meteorology)AlloyGrain sizePhase (matter)Titanium alloyDynamic recrystallizationThermodynamicsCrystallographyComposite materialHot workingChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the microstructural changes during hot deformation, mainly dynamic nucleation and growth of a precipitates, occurring in the b metastable titanium alloy Ti-5553 (Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–3Cr–0.5Fe). The effect of process variables on flow response and microstructure evolution during hot working of the alloy with initial bimodal microstructure was established using isothermal hot-compression tests. Testing was conducted at 4 strain rates between 0.001 and 1 s−1 and 5 temperatures between 720 °C and 850 °C, on material with prior b grain size of 450 μm, a nodular size of 3 µm and a known primary a-phase fraction. All flow curves exhibited a peak stress followed by moderate flow softening in the two-phase domain. Flow softening was interpreted in terms of deformation heating and substructure or texture evolutions. The dependence on strain rate and temperature of the kinetics of dynamic a-phase nucleation during straining is complex and appears to be of second-order importance compared to the effects of strain. This suggests that the nucleation and growth of a phase in the temperature range between 720 °C and 990 °C results from a mixed-mode displacive-diffusional transformation, similar to the austenite / ferrite transformation above the Ae3 temperature reported by some authors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicTitanium Alloys Microstructure and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207