MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092573100 · doi:10.1139/p01-150

Studies for the Odin sub-millimetre radiometer. II. Retrieval methodology

2002· article· en· W2092573100 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Philippe Baron, P. Ricaud, J. de La Noë, Patrick Eriksson, Frank Merino, Martin Ridal, D. Murtagh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsRemote sensingStratosphereRadianceRadiometerSpectral lineMillimeterInversion (geology)OpticsMeteorologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the first algorithm developed to retrieve atmospheric vertical profiles of trace gases from calibrated spectra measured by the sub-millimetre radiometer (SMR) onboard the Odin satellite. An estimation of atmospheric profiles is obtained by means of an inversion of the spectra using the Optimal Estimation Method. Great attention is paid to the study of the simultaneous retrieval of several species and nonlinearity effects. The measurement response is defined to give the altitude domain of a good retrieval. Main sources of measurement and forward model errors are characterized and separated into two categories: the fixed errors and the variable errors. We define a standard retrieval strategy that can be applied to theoretically investigate any frequency band of any observing Odin mode. For each frequency band, two categories of species are defined: the target species, i.e., the main species to be retrieved, and the interfering species, i.e., molecules emitting an interfering radiance in the observed band. The standard code is based upon an inversion of spectra using a linearized forward model and simultaneously estimates target species and interfering species. As an example, inversions of synthetic noise-free spectra of ozone and chlorine monoxide within an autocorrelator band ranging from 501.18 to 501.58 GHz are shown to behave as expected in the middle stratosphere and in the lower mesosphere. The error analysis shows retrieval limitations in the lower stratosphere that are mainly induced by the high sensitivity of the retrieval to parameters such as tangent height, accuracy in the vertical profile of the interfering species, and spectral parameters of both target lines and interfering lines. PACS Nos.: 42.68Ay, 07.07Df, 07.57Kp

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207