Bibliographic record
Abstract
Finding efficient representations is one of the most challenging and heavily sought problems in mathematics. Representation using shearlets recently receives a lot of attention due to their desirable properties in both theory and applications. Using the framework of frequency-based affine systems, in this paper we introduce and systematically study affine shear tight frames which include all known shearlet tight frames as special cases. Our results in this paper will resolve several key questions on shearlets. We provide a complete characterization for an affine shear tight frame and then use it to obtain smooth affine shear tight frames with all their generators in the Schwarz class. Though multiresolution analysis (MRA) is the foundation and key feature of wavelet analysis for fast numerical implementation of a wavelet transform, all the known shearlets so far do not possess any MRA structure and filter banks. In order to study affine shear tight frames with MRA structure, we introduce the notion of a sequence of affine shear tight frames and then we provide a complete characterization for it. Based on our characterizations, we present two different approaches, i.e., non-stationary and quasi-stationary, for the construction of sequences of affine shear tight frames with MRA structure such that all their generators are smooth (in the Schwarz class) and they have underlying filter banks. Consequently, their associated transforms can be efficiently implemented using filter banks similarly as a fast wavelet transform does.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".