MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092617392 · doi:10.1139/p07-074

Oscillatory thermoelectric effect in quasi-two-dimensional organic conductors in a magnetic field

2007· article· en· W2092617392 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Danica Krstovska, O. Galbova

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOrganic and Molecular Conductors Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCondensed matter physicsMagnetic fieldElectronQuantum oscillationsOscillation (cell signaling)ExcitationField (mathematics)Fermi surfaceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A theoretical analysis is presented of the dependence of the thermoelectric power, when the temperature gradient is directed along the normal to the layers, in a layered conductor, with a quasi-two-dimensional electron energy spectrum on the magnitude and orientation of a strong magnetic field relative to the layers. The angular oscillations of the thermoelectric power, when the magnetic field is noticeably tilted from the normal to the layers result from the periodic dependence of the average electron velocity on the angle between the normal to the layers and the magnetic field. It is shown that, in a quantizing magnetic field at low temperatures, giant quantum oscillations of thermoelectric power as a function of both the magnetic field magnitude and the angle between the normal to the layers and the magnetic field occur. This quantum oscillation effect can be used with a high degree of accuracy as a good spectroscopic method for the experimental study of certain characteristics of a Fermi surface of quasi-two-dimensional organic conductors, such as the quasi-two-dimensionality parameter of the electron energy spectrum, cyclotron effective electron mass, and velocity distribution of charge carriers as well as an accurate determination of the extremal cross sections. PACS No.: 72.15.Jf

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicOrganic and Molecular Conductors ResearchFrench-language works237,207