MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092658748 · doi:10.5539/mas.v9n3p192

Approach to Theoretical Analysis of Processes of Isothermal Straining of Anisotropic High-Strength Materials in Short-Time Creeping Mode

2015· article· en· W2092658748 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S. S. Yakovlev, С.Н. Ларин, В. И. Платонов

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationRussian Foundation for Fundamental Investigations
KeywordsIsothermal processAnisotropyMaterials scienceMechanicsWork (physics)KinematicsMode (computer interface)Flow (mathematics)Classical mechanicsThermodynamicsPhysicsComputer scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Work Objective. Developing an equation and correlations, which can be used for theoretical analysis of processes of isothermal straining achieved by gas environment and by rigid tools of anisotropic high-strength materials in the mode of short-time creeping. Study Methods The study of isothermal straining processes was performed on the basis of the theory of short-time creeping of anisotropic materials. Study Results. There were developed the principal equations and correlations for theoretical analysis of the kinematics of material flow, stressed and strained state, force conditions, and possibility frontiers for the processes of isothermal straining of anisotropic high-strength materials in the mode of short-time creeping. Conclusions. The equations obtained can be used for theoretical analysis of the processes of isothermal straining achieved by gas environment and by rigid tools of anisotropic high-strength materials in the mode of short-time creeping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicMetallurgy and Material FormingFrench-language works237,207