MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092677430 · doi:10.1142/s0219498816500298

Classification of linked indecomposable modules of a family of solvable Lie algebras over an arbitrary field of characteristic 0

2015· preprint· en· W2092677430 on OpenAlexafffund
Leandro Cagliero, Fernando Szechtman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Algebra and Its Applications · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsIndecomposable moduleMathematicsLie algebraNilpotentCombinatoricsField (mathematics)Abelian groupSpace (punctuation)Series (stratigraphy)Algebra over a fieldPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let 𝔤 be a finite-dimensional Lie algebra over a field of characteristic 0, with solvable radical 𝔯 and nilpotent radical 𝔫 = [𝔤, 𝔯]. Given a finite-dimensional 𝔤-module U, its nilpotency series 0 ⊂ U (1) ⊂ ⋯ ⊂ U (m) = U is defined so that U (1) is the 0-weight space of 𝔫 in U, U (2) /U (1) is the 0-weight space of 𝔫 in U/U (1) , and so on. We say that U is linked if each factor of its nilpotency series is a uniserial 𝔤/𝔫-module, i.e. its 𝔤/𝔫-submodules form a chain. Every uniserial 𝔤-module is linked, every linked 𝔤-module is indecomposable with irreducible socle, and both converses fail. In this paper, we classify all linked 𝔤-modules when 𝔤 = 〈x〉 ⋉ 𝔞 and ad x acts diagonalizably on the abelian Lie algebra 𝔞. Moreover, we identify and classify all uniserial 𝔤-modules amongst them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Algebra and Its ApplicationsSame topicAdvanced Topics in AlgebraFrench-language works237,207