Le recours au financement institutionnel des femmes proprietaires uniques d'exploitations agricoles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Le dynamisme des agricultrices québécoises présente des perspectives intéressantes pour l'avenir de l'agriculture du Québec. Depuis le début des années 1980, l'im‐portance des femmes propriétaires d'entreprises agri‐coles n'a cessé de croǐtre. Des recherches antérieures ont permis de constater qu'elles se distinguent à plusieurs titres. Entre autres, les agricultrices propriétaires uniques au Québec ont moins recours au financement que les autres exploitants et exploitantes agricoles. Les facteurs pouvant expliquer ce comportement sont principalement l'ǎge et l'attitude face au risque de la propriétaire, la taille de l'exploitation, le mode d'accès à la propriété et le type de production. Abstract The dynamism of women farmers bodes well for the future of agriculture in Quebec. Since the early 1980s, women farm owners have consistently increased in importance. Previous research findings show that specific features distinguish them from other farm owners. Among these we find that sole owners resort less to institutional financing than other farm owners. Factors that can explain this behaviour are the age of the women owners, their marital status, as well as the size of their business. The first two variables appear to reflect their attitude towards risk taking. Finally, three distinctive groups emerge when considering women who have not used bank financing during the last five years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".