<title>High performance computing with optical interconnects</title>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the role of optical interconnects in high performance computing systems is explored. A Network-of- Workstations (NOW) consists of a collection of commodity workstations or high-end Personal Computers (PCs) interconnected with a high bandwidth Local Area Network (LAN). Due to technological advances, it has been argued that NOWs can offer cost-effective high performance computing systems, ranging from low-end interactive computing to high-end parallel computing. Over the last decade the industry has been moving in this direction: Commercial high end computing systems such as the Silicon Graphics Origin 2000 multiprocessor support up to 512 dual-processor nodes interconnected with a scalable network. In this paper, we argue that when NOWs are enhanced with a new generation of very high bandwidth optical networks, they can provide supercomputer-class performance at a fraction of the cost. We describe the architectures of ring-based and star-based multi- terabit optical networks for multiprocessor systems, and discuss their impact on system performance. These networks exploit the CMOS/VCSEL optoelectronic integrated circuit technology to yield exceptionally large bandwidths with small form factors and potentially low cost. We view these new optical networks as the key to the future evolution of multiprocessor systems, and we believe that such systems can open a new era of exceptionally high performance computing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".