Structures, Functions, and Interactions of ClpT1 and ClpT2 in the Clp Protease System of Arabidopsis Chloroplasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plastid ClpT1 and ClpT2 are plant-specific proteins that associate with the ClpPR protease. However, their physiological significance and structures are not understood. Arabidopsis thaliana loss-of-function single clpt1 and clpt2 mutants showed no visible phenotypes, whereas clpt1 clpt2 double mutants showed delayed development, reduced plant growth, and virescent, serrated leaves but were viable and produced seed. The clpt1 and clpt1 clpt2 mutants showed partial destabilization of the ClpPR complex, whereas clpt2 null mutants showed only marginal destabilization. Comparative proteomics of clpt1 clpt2 plants showed a proteostasis phenotype similar to viable mutants in ClpPR core subunits, indicating reduced Clp protease capacity. In vivo and in vitro assays showed that ClpT1 and ClpT2 can independently interact with the single ClpP ring and ClpPR core, but not with the single ClpR ring. We determined ClpT1 and ClpT2 structures (2.4- and 2.0-Å resolution) and detailed the similarities to the N-domains of bacterial ClpA/C chaperones. The ClpT structures suggested a conserved MYFF motif for interaction with the ClpPR core near the interface between the P- and R-rings. In vivo complementation showed that ClpT function and ClpPR core stabilization require the MYFF motif. Several models are presented that may explain how ClpT1,2 contribute to ClpPR protease activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".